<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SimplyGeo.com Network Under Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining &#187; Domain News</title>
		<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining &#187; Domain News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>[...] SimplyGeo sheds light on a new project, an industry first Geo Domaining Network: &#8220;Many of you have sent many emails asking what services are coming and when. It has taken alot of work to get this far and much more work still needs to be done. This has been done in 3 months time since launching the blog in December.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SimplyGeo sheds light on a new project, an industry first Geo Domaining Network: &#8220;Many of you have sent many emails asking what services are coming and when. It has taken alot of work to get this far and much more work still needs to be done. This has been done in 3 months time since launching the blog in December.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</title>
		<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>[...] SimplyGeo sheds light on a new project, an industry first Geo Domaining Network: &#8220;Many of you have sent many emails asking what services are coming and when. It has taken alot of work to get this far and much more work still needs to be done. This has been done in 3 months time since launching the blog in December.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SimplyGeo sheds light on a new project, an industry first Geo Domaining Network: &#8220;Many of you have sent many emails asking what services are coming and when. It has taken alot of work to get this far and much more work still needs to be done. This has been done in 3 months time since launching the blog in December.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying, that makes more sense now.

***SMO***

No problem Andrew. Keep up the great work at DNW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying, that makes more sense now.</p>
<p>***SMO***</p>
<p>No problem Andrew. Keep up the great work at DNW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim davids</title>
		<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>tim davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>does this mean associated cities is dropping their geo-expo?

***SMO***

Their brand is GeoDomain Expo at geodomainexpo.com Tim.  I doubt they are dropping that.  As with many domains, all you have to do is research and you will find that 6 out of 10 times they are for sale. Some for crazy prices, others for great prices.  Don't know until you research.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean associated cities is dropping their geo-expo?</p>
<p>***SMO***</p>
<p>Their brand is GeoDomain Expo at geodomainexpo.com Tim.  I doubt they are dropping that.  As with many domains, all you have to do is research and you will find that 6 out of 10 times they are for sale. Some for crazy prices, others for great prices.  Don&#8217;t know until you research.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplygeo.com/2008/02/23/simplygeocom-network-under-development/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit confused...are you connected to Associated Cities in some way?

Also, you might want to select a different name than GeoDomainTools.com.  I know that 'domain tools' is somewhat generic, but Name Intelligence has branded that in this space.

***SMO***

&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE: &lt;/strong&gt; Found a good name GeoDomainServices.com. Will talk to my partner and see which one we will use, I like this one better. 

Thanks Andrew.

***SMO***

Andrew,

My partner Skip Hoagland is connected to AssociatedCities.com as a co-founder. We are supporting the entire industry. As far as the GeoDomainTools.com domain, there are no domains available to cover the services associated with this.  Acquisition funds are saved for elite names on our radar and to be announced once negotiations are completed, a few more will be announced soon.  

The name is generic, regardless of who exploited the name.  In this case, we would have to follow this same rule with domainer.com and our geodomainer.com. Its a market and the number one thing that matters is the domain that is discriptive.  We would love to own GeoServices.com, but the owners have other plans.  If someone could come up with a better domain to describe the exact variety of services, please advise.  There are none we found available in the aftermarket or thru registration that was as clear as GeoDomainTools.com.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit confused&#8230;are you connected to Associated Cities in some way?</p>
<p>Also, you might want to select a different name than GeoDomainTools.com.  I know that &#8216;domain tools&#8217; is somewhat generic, but Name Intelligence has branded that in this space.</p>
<p>***SMO***</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong> Found a good name GeoDomainServices.com. Will talk to my partner and see which one we will use, I like this one better. </p>
<p>Thanks Andrew.</p>
<p>***SMO***</p>
<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>My partner Skip Hoagland is connected to AssociatedCities.com as a co-founder. We are supporting the entire industry. As far as the GeoDomainTools.com domain, there are no domains available to cover the services associated with this.  Acquisition funds are saved for elite names on our radar and to be announced once negotiations are completed, a few more will be announced soon.  </p>
<p>The name is generic, regardless of who exploited the name.  In this case, we would have to follow this same rule with domainer.com and our geodomainer.com. Its a market and the number one thing that matters is the domain that is discriptive.  We would love to own GeoServices.com, but the owners have other plans.  If someone could come up with a better domain to describe the exact variety of services, please advise.  There are none we found available in the aftermarket or thru registration that was as clear as GeoDomainTools.com.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
